Blog Layout


Vodafone Warriors: Measuring the home-team sponsorship advantage

Brand sponsorships can be risky business. You're taking a gamble on what is essentially an intangible relationship - will there be a return on your investment, and how do you even begin to measure it?


The Challenge

How do you show value in sponsorships for brands?


This was the question the Vodafone Warriors posed of NeuroSpot in mid-2019. In particular, they wanted to understand what it was like to be a game-day supporter at the home ground - Mt Smart Stadium, and what impact a home game could have for their sponsors.


The Vodafone Warriors are one of New Zealand's most exciting professional sporting teams and are backed by a loyal fan base that spans the country. They've also attracted an extensive list of long-term sponsorship deals with well-known brands such as Vodafone, Canterbury of New Zealand, Mazda, and Asahi Beverages (Woodstock). These organisations understand the game, the team and the history, they want to be part of the trials and tribulations; they're not fair-weather sponsors, having stuck by the team throughout many a challenging season. What benefit do these brands get from their association with the team, and how can the Vodafone Warriors give these brands a home team advantage?


The team partnered with NeuroSpot to bring a scientific lens to the field, using the 2019 Round 24 match against the South Sydney Rabbitohs to understand how fan emotion translated to brand value.


The Solution

A scientific research approach to emotion


When undertaking consumer research, one of the benefits of talking direct to customers is that you get their verbatim thoughts - they tell you what’s consciously entered their minds. The downside is that they tell you exactly what they think they feel, as so much of our mental processing is subconscious. As humans, we are remarkably poor at being able to accurately describe what is going on inside our own heads. 


A scientific approach, like the one taken by NeuroSpot, measures the body's physiological response, instead of relying on consumers identification and recall of emotion. To answer this question for the Vodafone Warriors, NeuroSpot used biometric technology that measured changes in galvanic skin response - essentially, sweat - throughout the game. When your body encounters an emotional response (for instance, the elation of a try, anger of a ref's wrong call, or the disappointment of the other team scoring), your skin responds with subtle changes - so small you might not even notice them yourself.


Kicking off the study


20 fans were recruited and set up with two small sensors on their fingers and watched the game from a media box. The sensors were set up pre-game to enable baseline measures to be recorded, and then throughout the game NeuroSpot monitored and measured second-by-second fluctuations in fan emotion - and identified what caused it.


The Results

If you know a Vodafone Warriors fan, you'll know they're a passionate bunch - and watching their team live at the home stadium only heightens the excitement. This came through in the study, with an overall uplift of 38% in heightened emotion vs the baseline.


Vodafone Warriors player Ken Maumalo scored the second try for the team in this game, in what was the most exciting moment of the match - we observed a 44% uplift in heightened emotion when this occurred in the 37th minute. Only two minutes earlier the first try was scored by Adam Pompey, observing a 20% uplift. Onya, Ken.


The other team scoring? That's exciting.


You'd be hard pressed to find a true Vodafone Warriors fan who would tell you the other team scoring is exciting. But that's just what our study showed; with a 25% jump off the back of a breakaway try to Dane Gagai. Just goes to show, the excitement of a live sporting event doesn't just come from your team scoring - people respond to the excitement of both teams competing and the atmosphere at the event.


But do fans really care about the sponsors?


Let's get back to the crux of the question from our client. Are our fans taking the excitement and emotion of a live sporting match, and transferring that into positive brand associations for the sponsors?


As part of the study, fans were shown a series of sponsor adverts before the game started, and during the half-time break. Would the excitement of the game cause them to respond differently to the adverts?


In short: Yes. Our key finding was that emotional responses to the same adverts increased by 21% at half-time vs before the game. That means, watching the same advert during half-time stimulated a bigger emotional response from the fan.


While this study only looked at specific sponsor adverts before and half-way through the game, the uplift in emotion measured clearly demonstrates that a sponsorship can provide value to a brand, particularly when associated with a live sporting event. This is good news for the Vodafone Warriors and their sponsors, with more opportunity for positive associations by increasing sponsor logo placement both in stadium and on player uniforms.

 


NeuroSpot worked with Aaron Lawton, GM Marketing, Communications and Projects at NZ Warriors. He had this to say about working with us:

“We often hear that following the Vodafone Warriors is like riding the world’s longest rollercoaster ride. Sure, there’s sometimes disappointments, but there’s always plenty of excitement too when it comes to watching our games. That said, we wanted to know whether we could back up something so subjective with some more objective insight. Innovation and doing things differently is a key value here at the club so when the opportunity arose to do something like this, we absolutely jumped at the chance” 


A final note - in the particular game studied, the final result was Warriors 10, South Sydney Rabbitohs 31, which goes to show that no matter how your team play, it's still possible for your brand to reap the benefits from a sponsorship.

By Cole Armstrong 15 Mar, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
By Cole Armstrong 19 Jul, 2023
If I asked you to think back about an event, maybe a holiday or your last plane trip, your last dinner out, or a shopping experience, what would you remember? If I asked you to describe the experience, chances are you’d feel pretty confident about your memory, or at least some of the key elements. It turns out though, that confidence you’re feeling - it doesn’t relate to the accuracy of your memory. Faulty memories You’re not losing your mind, it’s just that your mind is playing tricks... sort of. We’ve spent quite a bit of time using eye tracking technology through our client projects. It enables us to see a participant’s behaviour – what they actually see and engage with - and the journeys people take through a physical environment, like a mall or retail setting. One project saw participants navigating a store with eye tracking glasses, getting items off a shopping list. As soon as they’d completed their journey, we asked which way they’d walked. Participants confidently recounted their route, and yet despite having literally just finished their journey, consistently missed out details. In another project we asked focus group participants about an image we’d shown them 20 minutes earlier. This elicited quite a spirited conversation about skin colour and how the illustrator’s choice of using a dark skin colour for all of the characters pointed to the racism of the illustrator and client. The thing was though, the characters weren’t dark skinned. Not one of them. And yet all of the participants convinced themselves this was the case. We’re certainly not the first to have encountered this phenomenon. There’s quite an active scene looking into issues with eyewitness testimony, and under which conditions our memory maybe unduly swayed or prone to errors. As you can imagine, the consequences of this could be huge. How can we stop getting it wrong? We’re not saying that our memories are always wrong – clearly that’s not the case! But there’s a rhyme and reason behind how our memory operates – both for good and bad. Our brains are BUSY. It’s like a hamster wheel going full on 24/7. Even when sleeping our brain is taking stock of the day, filing away moments into short and long-term memory. In order to look after us, our brains have to prioritise its resources, and it essentially takes shortcuts wherever possible, driving the same way to work each day, ordering the same coffee and so on. Imagine the fatigue we would face if we had to make every decision and action consciously, rather than letting our brains run the show. Which moments matter? So when our brain – a lazy but efficient workaholic – is sorting through events and the happenings of our day, it throws out the mundane, peripheral information it deems unimportant. It instead focuses on creating a highlight reel, and takes the moment of the events and experiences that were the most emotionally intensive, and the final moment. The concept is known as The Peak-End rule, and comes from Daniel Kahneman and his colleague Donald Redelmeier. Their 1996 study, which I am very pleased to not have been a participant in, involved 154 colonoscopy patients rating their level of discomfort at 60-second intervals throughout the procedure, as well as being asked to retrospectively describe how uncomfortable the procedure was. The level of discomfort during the procedure had no correlation to the discomfort they reported retrospectively. As an aside, they followed-up this study with yet more colonoscopy patients, who were split into two groups. One group had the standard procedure and experience of the camera being somewhat painfully removed, and the other had an amended experience that lasted three minutes longer, but which the camera removal was more uncomfortable than painful. The second group – with a longer procedure but less discomfort in the final moments – rated the procedure as less painful than the first group and were more likely to return for subsequent procedures. What was relevant was the peak level of discomfort experienced, as well as the level of discomfort in the final, end moments of the procedure. So what does this tell us? Firstly, that our memory is more fallible than we’d like to realise, more often made up of a series of stitched together moments and thoughts that can be revised and reinterpreted after the fact. Here’s an example - one of the best flights I’ve had was on Air New Zealand to Sydney – the first time we’d flown with my then-infant daughter (you can imagine our nerves!). At the end of the flight we apologised to the man next to us who’d (somehow) been working the whole 3.5 hours. We were suitably self-conscious at the amount of screaming he’d been subjected to but were greatly surprised at how nice he was – telling us that she’d been great, and how his (now teenage) children had subjected him through worse. Then some of the other passengers near us congratulated us on surviving a flight with an infant and how good a flyer she’d been – alongside the cabin staff who were making faces at our daughter to get her to laugh. It's honestly one of the best flights I remember – but clearly it wasn’t that pleasant at the time! The Peak-End rule in action – our actual and remembered experiences diverting wildly. How to apply these learnings to your work Don’t rely on people providing an accurate testimony of their experience. It’s more important to look at what a customer does vs what they say they do. When reviewing a process, journey or customer experience, focus on the moments that matter – the peak emotional moment and the final moment. This provides direction, stopping you from spreading your resources too thin and helping concentrate efforts on the moments most likely to have an impact. Be creative when designing experiences. Because our remembered experience is more important than our actual experience, you have a unique opportunity where you can creatively leave customers with an experience perhaps better than what they had… If you know there’s a frustration or issue during a process, while working on a fix for that, make sure your final moment knocks their socks off.
08 Nov, 2022
JCDecaux is one of the largest Out-of-Home businesses worldwide; in New Zealand it specialises in high quality Large Format and Airport touchpoints. JCDecaux is committed to delivering research-led validation to its partners regarding Out-of-Home effectiveness and looks for partners who can deliver neuro or behavioural methodologies that can deliver on this objective.
Show More
Share by: