Blog Layout


Inattentional blindness: Why a gorilla on a basketball court explains why no one saw your brand

Earlier this week I was talking to an old colleague about the latest advertising campaign they worked on. Media spend was relatively high but the latest tracker results had come in – and attribution was disappointing. I tried to reassure him that other brands had similar issues – I’m not certain it was that reassuring!


Why?


The challenge is that in our busy lives there’s so much info streaming past our eyes that never gets picked up – in fact much more than we realise. We’re focused on other tasks; we have other goals we’re trying to achieve. In short, there’s a lot going on. And of course, we’re not aware of what we’re missing. (As an example, one study found that only 18% of ‘viewable’ online adverts were actually seen by people).


The busyness of our lives can lead to something called inattentional blindness – one of the most entertaining ideas presented to first year psych students. What is it?


Watch the video below for an explanation.


WARNING: DON’T READ ON WITHOUT WATCHING THE VIDEO BELOW



The disappearing gorilla – that never disappears


Our mind’s a powerful thing – it pulls together a lot of different information to help us understand an amazingly complicated world. And sometimes it’s ability to focus attention on a task can make it blind to some pretty important bits of information – such as a gorilla walking across a stage and beating its chest.

The psychologists Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris demonstrated inattentional blindness in this now infamous experiment. By getting people to selectively attend to the people passing the basketball, they were able to blind people to something that in hindsight was obvious. Similar studies have shown this can also occur for auditory info.


Why? There are limits to our attentional capabilities – and when it’s overloaded or focused on something, it has to restrict the attention it gives to other information. Even if it’s a gorilla walking through the centre of your screen.


Commenting on the finding, Simons says:


"Although people do still try to rationalize why they missed the gorilla, it's hard to explain such a failure of awareness without confronting the possibility that we are aware of far less of our world than we think”

As an aside, Simons and Chabris did a follow-up video with similar results.

Inattentional blindness and advertising


A 2012 Colgate from Y&R Brazil takes advantage of people’s inattentional blindness in these dental floss adverts.

Did you notice anything unusual about these images? How about the fact that in the first image, the woman has too many fingers on her left hand? Or the phantom arm on the man’s shoulder in the second image? Or the missing ear on the man in the second image?


This campaign (tag line: “'Not even that [insert anatomical oddity] gets more attention than a mouth without care”) demonstrates that when people’s attention is focused on something, it can miss a whole lot else.


A more concerning insight comes from several bits of research I’ve been involved with over the past 18 months. Using eye tracking to find out what elements of NZ TV adverts viewers actually see, it’s become clear how few people notice key branding elements because attention is being focused on other story elements or bits of info (e.g. websites, products). Essentially the advert is competing with itself for viewer attention, and branding loses out.

 

What does this mean for advertisers?


Beware of the limits of your customer’s attention – and if you want them to remember who you are, try not to overload them with other tasks and story telling elements. Otherwise, your brand will be the gorilla on the court.


This article was first published by Cole Armstrong on LinkedIn in May 2019.


By Cole Armstrong 15 Mar, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
By Cole Armstrong 19 Jul, 2023
If I asked you to think back about an event, maybe a holiday or your last plane trip, your last dinner out, or a shopping experience, what would you remember? If I asked you to describe the experience, chances are you’d feel pretty confident about your memory, or at least some of the key elements. It turns out though, that confidence you’re feeling - it doesn’t relate to the accuracy of your memory. Faulty memories You’re not losing your mind, it’s just that your mind is playing tricks... sort of. We’ve spent quite a bit of time using eye tracking technology through our client projects. It enables us to see a participant’s behaviour – what they actually see and engage with - and the journeys people take through a physical environment, like a mall or retail setting. One project saw participants navigating a store with eye tracking glasses, getting items off a shopping list. As soon as they’d completed their journey, we asked which way they’d walked. Participants confidently recounted their route, and yet despite having literally just finished their journey, consistently missed out details. In another project we asked focus group participants about an image we’d shown them 20 minutes earlier. This elicited quite a spirited conversation about skin colour and how the illustrator’s choice of using a dark skin colour for all of the characters pointed to the racism of the illustrator and client. The thing was though, the characters weren’t dark skinned. Not one of them. And yet all of the participants convinced themselves this was the case. We’re certainly not the first to have encountered this phenomenon. There’s quite an active scene looking into issues with eyewitness testimony, and under which conditions our memory maybe unduly swayed or prone to errors. As you can imagine, the consequences of this could be huge. How can we stop getting it wrong? We’re not saying that our memories are always wrong – clearly that’s not the case! But there’s a rhyme and reason behind how our memory operates – both for good and bad. Our brains are BUSY. It’s like a hamster wheel going full on 24/7. Even when sleeping our brain is taking stock of the day, filing away moments into short and long-term memory. In order to look after us, our brains have to prioritise its resources, and it essentially takes shortcuts wherever possible, driving the same way to work each day, ordering the same coffee and so on. Imagine the fatigue we would face if we had to make every decision and action consciously, rather than letting our brains run the show. Which moments matter? So when our brain – a lazy but efficient workaholic – is sorting through events and the happenings of our day, it throws out the mundane, peripheral information it deems unimportant. It instead focuses on creating a highlight reel, and takes the moment of the events and experiences that were the most emotionally intensive, and the final moment. The concept is known as The Peak-End rule, and comes from Daniel Kahneman and his colleague Donald Redelmeier. Their 1996 study, which I am very pleased to not have been a participant in, involved 154 colonoscopy patients rating their level of discomfort at 60-second intervals throughout the procedure, as well as being asked to retrospectively describe how uncomfortable the procedure was. The level of discomfort during the procedure had no correlation to the discomfort they reported retrospectively. As an aside, they followed-up this study with yet more colonoscopy patients, who were split into two groups. One group had the standard procedure and experience of the camera being somewhat painfully removed, and the other had an amended experience that lasted three minutes longer, but which the camera removal was more uncomfortable than painful. The second group – with a longer procedure but less discomfort in the final moments – rated the procedure as less painful than the first group and were more likely to return for subsequent procedures. What was relevant was the peak level of discomfort experienced, as well as the level of discomfort in the final, end moments of the procedure. So what does this tell us? Firstly, that our memory is more fallible than we’d like to realise, more often made up of a series of stitched together moments and thoughts that can be revised and reinterpreted after the fact. Here’s an example - one of the best flights I’ve had was on Air New Zealand to Sydney – the first time we’d flown with my then-infant daughter (you can imagine our nerves!). At the end of the flight we apologised to the man next to us who’d (somehow) been working the whole 3.5 hours. We were suitably self-conscious at the amount of screaming he’d been subjected to but were greatly surprised at how nice he was – telling us that she’d been great, and how his (now teenage) children had subjected him through worse. Then some of the other passengers near us congratulated us on surviving a flight with an infant and how good a flyer she’d been – alongside the cabin staff who were making faces at our daughter to get her to laugh. It's honestly one of the best flights I remember – but clearly it wasn’t that pleasant at the time! The Peak-End rule in action – our actual and remembered experiences diverting wildly. How to apply these learnings to your work Don’t rely on people providing an accurate testimony of their experience. It’s more important to look at what a customer does vs what they say they do. When reviewing a process, journey or customer experience, focus on the moments that matter – the peak emotional moment and the final moment. This provides direction, stopping you from spreading your resources too thin and helping concentrate efforts on the moments most likely to have an impact. Be creative when designing experiences. Because our remembered experience is more important than our actual experience, you have a unique opportunity where you can creatively leave customers with an experience perhaps better than what they had… If you know there’s a frustration or issue during a process, while working on a fix for that, make sure your final moment knocks their socks off.
08 Nov, 2022
JCDecaux is one of the largest Out-of-Home businesses worldwide; in New Zealand it specialises in high quality Large Format and Airport touchpoints. JCDecaux is committed to delivering research-led validation to its partners regarding Out-of-Home effectiveness and looks for partners who can deliver neuro or behavioural methodologies that can deliver on this objective.
Show More
Share by: