Blog Layout


How do high functioning agile squads achieve progress? By thinking like a scientist.

Hands up if you work for a large corporate that hasn't shifted at least some of its resource to agile methodology? There's not many - over the last decade there has been a widespread shift across New Zealand organisations to agile. And it makes sense - break work into smaller chunks, deliver more frequently, pivot faster and realise business results sooner.



We've worked in, with and near some of these companies, and have witnessed a variety of results, all coming down to the way squads approached their challenges. After all, agile is just a structure, so what separates high and low functioning teams? One feature we witnessed of the high functioning teams is a curiosity informed by evidence: a scientific mindset.

A focus on the problem, not the solution

In many organisations, agile and non-agile alike, we see people seeking to provide solutions, at the expense of more careful consideration of problem definition or discovery, and with little investment in evaluating the impact of their ideas. 


This often ends up in a 'survival of the fittest' - or at times, survival of the loudest voice in the room. 


Agile done well helps teams focus on resolving a problem, rather than providing a solution. It's a subtle reframe, but an important one. It means working forward: agreeing on what the challenge is that our squad is being formed around; what metrics show us that the problem is there (and that we are potentially impacting it); and being clear about what our assumptions are. 


Squads engaged in this way are focused on learning and understanding what is really driving the challenges they are there to resolve. And it fits really nicely with the scientific approach. 


Getting into the right mindset

A scientific mindset doesn't mean getting out lab coats and chemistry sets. It's about taking the scientific learning process and applying it to your business challenges. 


In Richard Chataway’s book The Behaviour Business: How to apply behavioural science for business success, he points to the role of science in solving mankind’s problems, and how a scientific mindset is underpinning the success of some of the world’s most successful businesses.


“The houses we live in, the food we eat, the transport we use: all of these contain innovations that were developed by scientists using the scientific method. A hypothesis based on scientific evidence, followed by a deduction, and tested through observation. Then repeat. And yet, in business, little work is scientifically based. In fact, most of it involves no experimentation, and an awful lot is based on outdated assumptions. Isn’t it time we remove the guesswork?”


Consider the typical stages of a scientific process:


  1. Define a question to investigate
  2. Create hypothesis
  3. Test with an experiment
  4. Analyse data
  5. Report conclusions


You can see how easily these transfer to a business challenge/project situation:


  1. Turn your challenge into a question to investigate, e.g. "How might we increase the number of customers self-serving online?"
  2. Make observations, collect data, research - talk to actual customers, and don’t forget to review any research (including that conducted outside your organisation) you already have access to.
  3. Create your hypothesis. Remember, this is essentially your educated guess on how to answer your question in step 1. For instance, "Redesigning the self-service menu to highlight the three most common tasks will encourage more customers to trial an online service offering, before resorting to phone"
  4. Put the hypothesis out to experiment. In this scenario, an A|B test could work well, in which half of customers see the existing webpage and half see an updated webpage.
  5. Analyse the results. Did it work? Or did it simply sound like a good idea, that failed to have an impact in the real world?
  6. Review and implement, adapt and re-test, or workshop through the next challenge. E.g. what did we learn? Should we scale up and turn into a BAU proposition? Are there some customer segments that this didn’t work for, and need a different solution?


Delight in being wrong

Of course, testing our concepts can mean we discover they don't work. 


There’s a scientific principle that our theories are never proven to be true, only proven to be wrong. This means it only takes one result to disprove an idea, and that all others are just in a permanent twilight zone waiting to be shown that they are wrong. From a business or design perspective, that probably feels unsatisfactory (or unmotivating and generally depressing!). But from a learning perspective - and when viewing it from a long-term impact perspective - it's actually ideal. 


We want to find out that we're wrong, so that we can more quickly, effectively and cheaply, move onto more effective ideas. It's the ultimate ‘test and learn’. 


There's a certain humility in being guided by the evidence, allowing yourself and your squad to put aside your own ideas and expectations, and accept what emerges from the discovery and testing process. The evidence can come from a range of sources, and some are more rigorous than others. But the key is to rely on the evidence at hand - even when it goes against our pet theories or ideas. 


Try reframing being wrong from a failure (which it's not), to a cause for celebration - the test was successful! And then you can do what all good scientists do: find another question to investigate.


Moving faster … with more curiosity 

Taking on this approach in your squad shouldn't mean you take the fun out of ideation and delivery, it's just about helping you streamline your processes to deliver the right solution, for the right problem. It's up to your squad's experience and judgement to decide where to focus attention and how to apply the findings.


The other benefit is that this process should help your squad move faster, from problem statement, to solution possibilities, to scalable strategies. For teams struggling to get traction it’s a great way to see – and demonstrate – progress, and move past having the same ‘what if’ conversations over and over again.


If you need some help or ideas on applying a scientific mindset to your project or challenge, get in touch.


By Cole Armstrong 15 Mar, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
By Cole Armstrong 19 Jul, 2023
If I asked you to think back about an event, maybe a holiday or your last plane trip, your last dinner out, or a shopping experience, what would you remember? If I asked you to describe the experience, chances are you’d feel pretty confident about your memory, or at least some of the key elements. It turns out though, that confidence you’re feeling - it doesn’t relate to the accuracy of your memory. Faulty memories You’re not losing your mind, it’s just that your mind is playing tricks... sort of. We’ve spent quite a bit of time using eye tracking technology through our client projects. It enables us to see a participant’s behaviour – what they actually see and engage with - and the journeys people take through a physical environment, like a mall or retail setting. One project saw participants navigating a store with eye tracking glasses, getting items off a shopping list. As soon as they’d completed their journey, we asked which way they’d walked. Participants confidently recounted their route, and yet despite having literally just finished their journey, consistently missed out details. In another project we asked focus group participants about an image we’d shown them 20 minutes earlier. This elicited quite a spirited conversation about skin colour and how the illustrator’s choice of using a dark skin colour for all of the characters pointed to the racism of the illustrator and client. The thing was though, the characters weren’t dark skinned. Not one of them. And yet all of the participants convinced themselves this was the case. We’re certainly not the first to have encountered this phenomenon. There’s quite an active scene looking into issues with eyewitness testimony, and under which conditions our memory maybe unduly swayed or prone to errors. As you can imagine, the consequences of this could be huge. How can we stop getting it wrong? We’re not saying that our memories are always wrong – clearly that’s not the case! But there’s a rhyme and reason behind how our memory operates – both for good and bad. Our brains are BUSY. It’s like a hamster wheel going full on 24/7. Even when sleeping our brain is taking stock of the day, filing away moments into short and long-term memory. In order to look after us, our brains have to prioritise its resources, and it essentially takes shortcuts wherever possible, driving the same way to work each day, ordering the same coffee and so on. Imagine the fatigue we would face if we had to make every decision and action consciously, rather than letting our brains run the show. Which moments matter? So when our brain – a lazy but efficient workaholic – is sorting through events and the happenings of our day, it throws out the mundane, peripheral information it deems unimportant. It instead focuses on creating a highlight reel, and takes the moment of the events and experiences that were the most emotionally intensive, and the final moment. The concept is known as The Peak-End rule, and comes from Daniel Kahneman and his colleague Donald Redelmeier. Their 1996 study, which I am very pleased to not have been a participant in, involved 154 colonoscopy patients rating their level of discomfort at 60-second intervals throughout the procedure, as well as being asked to retrospectively describe how uncomfortable the procedure was. The level of discomfort during the procedure had no correlation to the discomfort they reported retrospectively. As an aside, they followed-up this study with yet more colonoscopy patients, who were split into two groups. One group had the standard procedure and experience of the camera being somewhat painfully removed, and the other had an amended experience that lasted three minutes longer, but which the camera removal was more uncomfortable than painful. The second group – with a longer procedure but less discomfort in the final moments – rated the procedure as less painful than the first group and were more likely to return for subsequent procedures. What was relevant was the peak level of discomfort experienced, as well as the level of discomfort in the final, end moments of the procedure. So what does this tell us? Firstly, that our memory is more fallible than we’d like to realise, more often made up of a series of stitched together moments and thoughts that can be revised and reinterpreted after the fact. Here’s an example - one of the best flights I’ve had was on Air New Zealand to Sydney – the first time we’d flown with my then-infant daughter (you can imagine our nerves!). At the end of the flight we apologised to the man next to us who’d (somehow) been working the whole 3.5 hours. We were suitably self-conscious at the amount of screaming he’d been subjected to but were greatly surprised at how nice he was – telling us that she’d been great, and how his (now teenage) children had subjected him through worse. Then some of the other passengers near us congratulated us on surviving a flight with an infant and how good a flyer she’d been – alongside the cabin staff who were making faces at our daughter to get her to laugh. It's honestly one of the best flights I remember – but clearly it wasn’t that pleasant at the time! The Peak-End rule in action – our actual and remembered experiences diverting wildly. How to apply these learnings to your work Don’t rely on people providing an accurate testimony of their experience. It’s more important to look at what a customer does vs what they say they do. When reviewing a process, journey or customer experience, focus on the moments that matter – the peak emotional moment and the final moment. This provides direction, stopping you from spreading your resources too thin and helping concentrate efforts on the moments most likely to have an impact. Be creative when designing experiences. Because our remembered experience is more important than our actual experience, you have a unique opportunity where you can creatively leave customers with an experience perhaps better than what they had… If you know there’s a frustration or issue during a process, while working on a fix for that, make sure your final moment knocks their socks off.
08 Nov, 2022
JCDecaux is one of the largest Out-of-Home businesses worldwide; in New Zealand it specialises in high quality Large Format and Airport touchpoints. JCDecaux is committed to delivering research-led validation to its partners regarding Out-of-Home effectiveness and looks for partners who can deliver neuro or behavioural methodologies that can deliver on this objective.
Show More
Share by: