Blog Layout


Breaking (or creating) the cycle: The challenge of habits in behaviour change

Is there anything in your life that you do repeatedly, whether that's monthly, weekly or several times a day, that you do a certain way? Something you do on autopilot, without a lot of thought?

Of course there is.

Have a think about these tasks - do you follow the same routine every time?


  • Doing a weekly supermarket shop in store - do you tend to buy the same brands of food, shampoo etc. each time? Explore the store in the same way?
  • Which stores do you visit – is it the same supermarket? Petrol station? Café on the way to work?
  • Putting your shoes and socks on - are you a sock/sock/shoe/shoe person or a sock/shoe/sock/shoe? Do you always start with the same foot?
  • Doing the dishes - do they pile up on the bench, or in the sink? Do you rinse before putting them in the dishwasher? Does the dishwasher go on at the same time each day? Do you empty it straight away or when you're next getting a meal prepared?


For the tasks we've mentioned above, there is no right or wrong way to do them. If your pantry’s stocked, your car is topped up with petrol (unless you’ve taken the socially minded EV route), you've got your shoes and socks on and a kitchen of clean dishes* - you've succeeded. But the way we each go about doing these tasks is generally so engrained in us, that we do them without thinking.

 

*We do acknowledge the many domestic arguments that can come from different household members having a different routine for these tasks. If you're a 'dishes do NOT go in the sink' person living with a 'dishes go in the sink until I'm ready to deal with them' person, I feel you. ^SG


And that’s great. By performing these tasks on autopilot we’re able to direct our attention – and our limited headspace – to more important topics.

 

Imagine now you're a retail store, trying to change the way people walk around your shop, a contact centre manager, trying to get your team to reduce call handling times by a few seconds, or an FMCG brand trying to increase purchase of your products. Or maybe you work hard all day, you're tired and you just don't want to see a sink full of dirty dishes when there is an empty dishwasher waiting nearby.

 

In each of these situations, you're trying to change someone's behaviour, and likely to come up against someone’s existing habits. 

So what is a habit?

Essentially, a habit is a behaviour that you perform in the same way, in response to specific situations every time. It’s an automatic and inflexible response, and although it may have started out as a choice, it’s become an engrained habit through repetition.


When you first performed the behaviour, it would have taken more brain power and thought, but through the repetition, over time, the behaviour is now performed with little conscious thought.

How do habits get formed?

Charles Duhigg, an American writer, coined 'the habit loop' in his 2014 book 'The power of habit', from a simple neurological loop discovered by MIT researchers. The idea is that there are three key stages involved in forming every habit, and once you've identified each component, you can then start to work on changing the habit.

Diagram showing the habit loop, with the words 'cue', 'routine' and 'reward' with arrows going around making it a circular process

Cue: This is what kicks off the habit behaviour, the 'thing' that starts the chain of events. Cues could be: location, time, emotional state, other people and the immediately preceding action.


Routine: The most obvious part of the loop, and the behaviour that you are looking to change.


Reward: The reward is the craving the behaviour satisfies. 


For example, every morning I sit down in my office to start work [cue] with a cup of coffee (black no sugar) and read The Spinoff’s Bulletin email [routine], which gives me a sense of contentment and control [the reward]. There is little thought, it simply occurs automatically in response to the time and location.

What are the challenges of habits?

The key challenge of habits - for anyone wanting to change one - is that they occur subconsciously, and they can occur long after their utility has waned. As an example, I once did a lot of training to complete the NZ Ironman (2015 … it was before kids), which required a lot of food intake. Unfortunately, after Ironman – when I stopped training – the food habit continued and my weight ballooned.


The habit continued long after the requirement for all those extra calories had disappeared.


From a different perspective, I recently moved house and now have a 10min walk to a ferry terminal. This ferry could take me across the water to Hobsonville Point, a new suburb in which several members of my family live. While I knew the ferry was there, by habit, I consistently put my kids in the car and took a much longer commute to visit family. It wasn’t an issue of awareness, it was a habit that had outlived it’s usefulness.

How do you create a new habit?

The idea behind the habit loop is that once you have identified what triggers the behaviour, the reward it provides, and the behaviour itself, you can begin to adapt it. Through experimentation you can find a behaviour that triggers the same emotional response (reward) as the original.


If there is a new habit you want to create - e.g. bringing your lunch to work instead of buying it, or going to the gym every day - you need to create the cue and reward that will set you up for success.


For example, to build an exercise habit could you leave your shoes by the bed (the cue) to trigger a run in the morning (the routine), which finishes at your local café for a coffee (the reward)?

What about breaking a habit?

The approach we've outlined above relies on new habit formation - what if you would instead like to simply break a habit? Perhaps stop customers from leaving clothes on the changing room floor, or stop employees from talking over others and interrupting in meetings.

 

In this instance, the science of habits would tell us that we should remove the cue that causes our customers or employees to perform the related behaviour, or replace it with a competing cue. Do customers leave clothes on the floor because there aren't enough hooks? Try a clothing bin just outside the doorway. Are employees interrupting because they don't feel they usually get enough time to share their ideas? Try changing the meeting format!


But one of the biggest opportunities is some disruption to our existing routines. Moving house, changing jobs, getting married or having a child, as examples, are all changes that might allow us to create new, or replace old, routines.


A good example comes from the UK … during the 2014 London underground strike some, but not all, of the networks underground stations were forced to close. This meant some commuters were forced to look for new routes while others were able to continue as normal. After strikes finished, 5% of disrupted commuters continued with their new routines – the new habit had stuck.


Perhaps that’s why we’re seeing some organisations coming through the past two-years of COVID disruptions (e.g., lockdowns, working from home) stronger. Through intent or luck, they’ve been able to align themselves with the new habits of their users.

Want to know more?

If you're interested in learning more about habits, get in touch or follow us on LinkedIn.

By Cole Armstrong 15 Mar, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
By Cole Armstrong 19 Jul, 2023
If I asked you to think back about an event, maybe a holiday or your last plane trip, your last dinner out, or a shopping experience, what would you remember? If I asked you to describe the experience, chances are you’d feel pretty confident about your memory, or at least some of the key elements. It turns out though, that confidence you’re feeling - it doesn’t relate to the accuracy of your memory. Faulty memories You’re not losing your mind, it’s just that your mind is playing tricks... sort of. We’ve spent quite a bit of time using eye tracking technology through our client projects. It enables us to see a participant’s behaviour – what they actually see and engage with - and the journeys people take through a physical environment, like a mall or retail setting. One project saw participants navigating a store with eye tracking glasses, getting items off a shopping list. As soon as they’d completed their journey, we asked which way they’d walked. Participants confidently recounted their route, and yet despite having literally just finished their journey, consistently missed out details. In another project we asked focus group participants about an image we’d shown them 20 minutes earlier. This elicited quite a spirited conversation about skin colour and how the illustrator’s choice of using a dark skin colour for all of the characters pointed to the racism of the illustrator and client. The thing was though, the characters weren’t dark skinned. Not one of them. And yet all of the participants convinced themselves this was the case. We’re certainly not the first to have encountered this phenomenon. There’s quite an active scene looking into issues with eyewitness testimony, and under which conditions our memory maybe unduly swayed or prone to errors. As you can imagine, the consequences of this could be huge. How can we stop getting it wrong? We’re not saying that our memories are always wrong – clearly that’s not the case! But there’s a rhyme and reason behind how our memory operates – both for good and bad. Our brains are BUSY. It’s like a hamster wheel going full on 24/7. Even when sleeping our brain is taking stock of the day, filing away moments into short and long-term memory. In order to look after us, our brains have to prioritise its resources, and it essentially takes shortcuts wherever possible, driving the same way to work each day, ordering the same coffee and so on. Imagine the fatigue we would face if we had to make every decision and action consciously, rather than letting our brains run the show. Which moments matter? So when our brain – a lazy but efficient workaholic – is sorting through events and the happenings of our day, it throws out the mundane, peripheral information it deems unimportant. It instead focuses on creating a highlight reel, and takes the moment of the events and experiences that were the most emotionally intensive, and the final moment. The concept is known as The Peak-End rule, and comes from Daniel Kahneman and his colleague Donald Redelmeier. Their 1996 study, which I am very pleased to not have been a participant in, involved 154 colonoscopy patients rating their level of discomfort at 60-second intervals throughout the procedure, as well as being asked to retrospectively describe how uncomfortable the procedure was. The level of discomfort during the procedure had no correlation to the discomfort they reported retrospectively. As an aside, they followed-up this study with yet more colonoscopy patients, who were split into two groups. One group had the standard procedure and experience of the camera being somewhat painfully removed, and the other had an amended experience that lasted three minutes longer, but which the camera removal was more uncomfortable than painful. The second group – with a longer procedure but less discomfort in the final moments – rated the procedure as less painful than the first group and were more likely to return for subsequent procedures. What was relevant was the peak level of discomfort experienced, as well as the level of discomfort in the final, end moments of the procedure. So what does this tell us? Firstly, that our memory is more fallible than we’d like to realise, more often made up of a series of stitched together moments and thoughts that can be revised and reinterpreted after the fact. Here’s an example - one of the best flights I’ve had was on Air New Zealand to Sydney – the first time we’d flown with my then-infant daughter (you can imagine our nerves!). At the end of the flight we apologised to the man next to us who’d (somehow) been working the whole 3.5 hours. We were suitably self-conscious at the amount of screaming he’d been subjected to but were greatly surprised at how nice he was – telling us that she’d been great, and how his (now teenage) children had subjected him through worse. Then some of the other passengers near us congratulated us on surviving a flight with an infant and how good a flyer she’d been – alongside the cabin staff who were making faces at our daughter to get her to laugh. It's honestly one of the best flights I remember – but clearly it wasn’t that pleasant at the time! The Peak-End rule in action – our actual and remembered experiences diverting wildly. How to apply these learnings to your work Don’t rely on people providing an accurate testimony of their experience. It’s more important to look at what a customer does vs what they say they do. When reviewing a process, journey or customer experience, focus on the moments that matter – the peak emotional moment and the final moment. This provides direction, stopping you from spreading your resources too thin and helping concentrate efforts on the moments most likely to have an impact. Be creative when designing experiences. Because our remembered experience is more important than our actual experience, you have a unique opportunity where you can creatively leave customers with an experience perhaps better than what they had… If you know there’s a frustration or issue during a process, while working on a fix for that, make sure your final moment knocks their socks off.
08 Nov, 2022
JCDecaux is one of the largest Out-of-Home businesses worldwide; in New Zealand it specialises in high quality Large Format and Airport touchpoints. JCDecaux is committed to delivering research-led validation to its partners regarding Out-of-Home effectiveness and looks for partners who can deliver neuro or behavioural methodologies that can deliver on this objective.
Show More
Share by: