Blog Layout


A vaccinated workforce - motivating staff to get the jab

Yes, we're going there: the COVID-19 vaccine. But we're not here to debate the science, rather a problem facing some organisations: low vaccination rates.

New Zealand is a country built on production. Between our primary, manufacturing, transport, logistics and retail trade industries alone, it’s a $65 billion contribution to our GDP. That’s a lot of workplaces built on large team environments, people movement and the flow of goods. So it stands to reason that an employer would want that workforce to be vaccinated, at the very least for their employee’s own health and that of their community.


Added to that, many of our essential businesses (such as retail, supermarket or transport) are reliant on one or a few distribution centres. The risk associated with COVID-19 affecting workforces in these sites, whether from a moral or operations standpoint, has been highlighted with recent cases at NZ Post’s distribution centre


Despite living in a developed world largely free of infectious diseases - thanks to modern vaccinations - more individuals than ever are feeling hesitancy around whether to get the COVID-19 vaccine themselves. Evidence suggests that few of these people are outright ‘anti-vaxxers’; most support the concept of being vaccinated. But as we look forward to an economy that is more resilient to COVID-19 in whatever shape or form that may be, many will be looking at our (unvaccinated) workforce as a potential weak spot – whether from the risk of shutting down sites, the potential it can have on the wider economy and needs for regional lockdowns, or from a health and safety perspective.


So what can employers do to increase the likelihood that their staff will get vaccinated, and reduce the risks inherent from this virus?


The most straightforward approach would be to mandate it. But regardless of whether that’s even legal, there’s a risk of backlash amongst your workforce and the wider community.

 

Another common approach is education and awareness programmes. As a behaviour change solution, such programmes are often not a solution by themselves, but require additional supporting strategies to address the impediments to seeing the desired change. So, it could be a good idea to make people aware of the need to get vaccinated, but don’t assume more education and information will be the solution.


What other options are there?

Thankfully, behavioural scientists around the world have looked at this issue, and similar issues for a number of years. There are a few options that can work:


A trusted messenger

Who is telling people to get vaccinated? If it’s you the employer, then you might not be someone whose opinion is respected in the context of vaccinations. Trusted internal – or external – messengers with a respected opinion could help.


Make vaccination the social norm

People inherently want to belong, so encourage everyone in the workforce who is vaccinated to wear some form of pin, or something that might indicate their support. Then, you’ll increase the social proof that vaccination is something worth doing.


Play to a different identity

People have multiple self-identities, so while one identity might be the barrier to vaccination (e.g. from a religious or peer-group standpoint) another could be the key motivator (e.g. encouraging multiple generations to get vaccinated together, or “doing it for your family” could activate a parents role to protect their loved ones).


Let people play hooky 

If you’re able to offer vaccinations at your workplace, can you time it for when people are most receptive to the message? Timing matters, so potentially asking people towards the end of their shift, for example, might lead to greater uptake as people try to avoid work!


Procrastinate today, but commit to tomorrow

Can you get people to commit to getting a vaccine ahead of time? It’s been shown that people might agree to do tomorrow what they don’t want to do today, and being reminded of this commitment has a strong impact.


Cole, your Pfizer vaccine dose is ready and waiting

Can you send targeted text messages to your workforce that let them know their dose is waiting for them? Research from the USA has shown a personalised approach has a strong impact on vaccine uptake. 


No barrier is too small: remove obstacles

Finally, what are the small points of friction, the small additional points of effort that people might need to go through? Offering vaccinations offsite? Bring it onsite. People need to book a vaccination slot into their shift? Do it for them, with the option to reschedule. 


What we’re trying to do is use multiple psychological cues to increase people’s motivation and ability to get vaccinated. The more approaches used, the better the chances for success. 


Ultimately, people’s reasons for not getting vaccinated can stem from a range of sources. And without being moralistic about the issue, they will be making the best decisions based upon their experiences, their access and the motivations that are put in front of them. 



Our goal is to support a choice towards getting vaccinated. Good luck!


By Cole Armstrong 15 Mar, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
By Cole Armstrong 19 Jul, 2023
If I asked you to think back about an event, maybe a holiday or your last plane trip, your last dinner out, or a shopping experience, what would you remember? If I asked you to describe the experience, chances are you’d feel pretty confident about your memory, or at least some of the key elements. It turns out though, that confidence you’re feeling - it doesn’t relate to the accuracy of your memory. Faulty memories You’re not losing your mind, it’s just that your mind is playing tricks... sort of. We’ve spent quite a bit of time using eye tracking technology through our client projects. It enables us to see a participant’s behaviour – what they actually see and engage with - and the journeys people take through a physical environment, like a mall or retail setting. One project saw participants navigating a store with eye tracking glasses, getting items off a shopping list. As soon as they’d completed their journey, we asked which way they’d walked. Participants confidently recounted their route, and yet despite having literally just finished their journey, consistently missed out details. In another project we asked focus group participants about an image we’d shown them 20 minutes earlier. This elicited quite a spirited conversation about skin colour and how the illustrator’s choice of using a dark skin colour for all of the characters pointed to the racism of the illustrator and client. The thing was though, the characters weren’t dark skinned. Not one of them. And yet all of the participants convinced themselves this was the case. We’re certainly not the first to have encountered this phenomenon. There’s quite an active scene looking into issues with eyewitness testimony, and under which conditions our memory maybe unduly swayed or prone to errors. As you can imagine, the consequences of this could be huge. How can we stop getting it wrong? We’re not saying that our memories are always wrong – clearly that’s not the case! But there’s a rhyme and reason behind how our memory operates – both for good and bad. Our brains are BUSY. It’s like a hamster wheel going full on 24/7. Even when sleeping our brain is taking stock of the day, filing away moments into short and long-term memory. In order to look after us, our brains have to prioritise its resources, and it essentially takes shortcuts wherever possible, driving the same way to work each day, ordering the same coffee and so on. Imagine the fatigue we would face if we had to make every decision and action consciously, rather than letting our brains run the show. Which moments matter? So when our brain – a lazy but efficient workaholic – is sorting through events and the happenings of our day, it throws out the mundane, peripheral information it deems unimportant. It instead focuses on creating a highlight reel, and takes the moment of the events and experiences that were the most emotionally intensive, and the final moment. The concept is known as The Peak-End rule, and comes from Daniel Kahneman and his colleague Donald Redelmeier. Their 1996 study, which I am very pleased to not have been a participant in, involved 154 colonoscopy patients rating their level of discomfort at 60-second intervals throughout the procedure, as well as being asked to retrospectively describe how uncomfortable the procedure was. The level of discomfort during the procedure had no correlation to the discomfort they reported retrospectively. As an aside, they followed-up this study with yet more colonoscopy patients, who were split into two groups. One group had the standard procedure and experience of the camera being somewhat painfully removed, and the other had an amended experience that lasted three minutes longer, but which the camera removal was more uncomfortable than painful. The second group – with a longer procedure but less discomfort in the final moments – rated the procedure as less painful than the first group and were more likely to return for subsequent procedures. What was relevant was the peak level of discomfort experienced, as well as the level of discomfort in the final, end moments of the procedure. So what does this tell us? Firstly, that our memory is more fallible than we’d like to realise, more often made up of a series of stitched together moments and thoughts that can be revised and reinterpreted after the fact. Here’s an example - one of the best flights I’ve had was on Air New Zealand to Sydney – the first time we’d flown with my then-infant daughter (you can imagine our nerves!). At the end of the flight we apologised to the man next to us who’d (somehow) been working the whole 3.5 hours. We were suitably self-conscious at the amount of screaming he’d been subjected to but were greatly surprised at how nice he was – telling us that she’d been great, and how his (now teenage) children had subjected him through worse. Then some of the other passengers near us congratulated us on surviving a flight with an infant and how good a flyer she’d been – alongside the cabin staff who were making faces at our daughter to get her to laugh. It's honestly one of the best flights I remember – but clearly it wasn’t that pleasant at the time! The Peak-End rule in action – our actual and remembered experiences diverting wildly. How to apply these learnings to your work Don’t rely on people providing an accurate testimony of their experience. It’s more important to look at what a customer does vs what they say they do. When reviewing a process, journey or customer experience, focus on the moments that matter – the peak emotional moment and the final moment. This provides direction, stopping you from spreading your resources too thin and helping concentrate efforts on the moments most likely to have an impact. Be creative when designing experiences. Because our remembered experience is more important than our actual experience, you have a unique opportunity where you can creatively leave customers with an experience perhaps better than what they had… If you know there’s a frustration or issue during a process, while working on a fix for that, make sure your final moment knocks their socks off.
08 Nov, 2022
JCDecaux is one of the largest Out-of-Home businesses worldwide; in New Zealand it specialises in high quality Large Format and Airport touchpoints. JCDecaux is committed to delivering research-led validation to its partners regarding Out-of-Home effectiveness and looks for partners who can deliver neuro or behavioural methodologies that can deliver on this objective.
Show More
Share by: