Blog Layout


What JCDecaux can do for your brand in 2 seconds

JCDecaux is one of the largest Out-of-Home businesses worldwide; in New Zealand it specialises in high quality Large Format and Airport touchpoints. JCDecaux is committed to delivering research-led validation to its partners regarding Out-of-Home effectiveness and looks for partners who can deliver neuro or behavioural methodologies that can deliver on this objective.


The Challenge

A strong believer in the use of distinctive brand codes for memorability, the New Zealand team wanted to demonstrate to partners that the use of strong branding in the out-of-home medium can increase the likelihood that their brand will spring to mind in a purchase situation. This concept, known as mental availability and infamously popularised in Byron Sharp’s book How Brands Grow, has been well proven to be the cornerstone of effective marketing. 



Our key objective working with JCDecaux was to prove that Out-of-Home creative with strong brand codes could maintain or grow mental availability for brands, compared to advertising with weaker brand cues. 


The Solution

We surveyed over 1,600 New Zealanders, showing people a range of Large Format ads for just two seconds each – about the length of time people typically view Out-of-Home advertising. Of the adverts shown, we were particularly interested in five brands or categories: Automotive, Banking, Beer, Energy and Bread. These were chosen to represent a range of sectors, covering faster and slower consideration categories, and less/more well-known brands. 


For each of the five categories, people were randomly allocated to one of three conditions, where they saw either no advert for the brand (our baseline/control), a week brand coded advert for the brand or a strong brand coded advert.


The categories chosen were cluttered categories and the brands were not clear leaders, so the intention was to see whether we could increase mental availability for brands (vs a control group) as a result of seeing creative that used strong brand codes (and was thus memorable).




The Results

The most exciting finding is that this research reiterates that Large Format Out-of-Home advertising is effective; it increases the likelihood that your brand springs to mind in a buying situation, and that strongly branded advertising outperforms weaker branded advertising. This is regardless of whether someone recalled the advert


The results we saw were particularly impressive when you consider that our participants saw each Large Format piece of creative just once for two seconds each, and that along with the five test brands, we included a further nine distractor adverts.


  • Being seen in any capacity on Large Format, just once: 23% uplift in category mental availability compared with control group.
  • Strong brand coded creative averaged 13% uplift in category mental availability compared with weakly coded creative.
  • Strong brand coded creative was 31% more liked compared with weakly coded creative.
  • Liked ads saw 18% uplift in category mental availability compared with disliked ads.



Here's what JCDecaux New Zealand Senior Insights and Strategy Specialist Victoria Parsons had to say about working with us:

“At JCDecaux, we believe advertising ‘works’ through building memory structures that consumers call on in a buying situation. Large Format, as a commanding, visual channel, is an ideal media to deliver simple, emotive and memorable campaigns – however, unless these campaigns are correctly linked to the brand in question, they do not deliver commercial outcomes. The use of distinctive brand codes, that consumers instinctively recognise, helps in this challenge. We know brand codes deliver effective outcomes for brands however being able to put specific numbers on the impact strongly coded Out-of-Home creative has on mental availability – when shown just one ad for two seconds – is extremely useful. NeuroSpot was a pleasure to work with on this project – their methodology was clever and enabled us to have results that were easy to communicate to our partners - their insight and judgement have been instrumental in this project being noted by the marketing industry in NZ and abroad. We are scoping our next project together to continue our research in this theme".

By Cole Armstrong 15 Mar, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
By Cole Armstrong 19 Jul, 2023
If I asked you to think back about an event, maybe a holiday or your last plane trip, your last dinner out, or a shopping experience, what would you remember? If I asked you to describe the experience, chances are you’d feel pretty confident about your memory, or at least some of the key elements. It turns out though, that confidence you’re feeling - it doesn’t relate to the accuracy of your memory. Faulty memories You’re not losing your mind, it’s just that your mind is playing tricks... sort of. We’ve spent quite a bit of time using eye tracking technology through our client projects. It enables us to see a participant’s behaviour – what they actually see and engage with - and the journeys people take through a physical environment, like a mall or retail setting. One project saw participants navigating a store with eye tracking glasses, getting items off a shopping list. As soon as they’d completed their journey, we asked which way they’d walked. Participants confidently recounted their route, and yet despite having literally just finished their journey, consistently missed out details. In another project we asked focus group participants about an image we’d shown them 20 minutes earlier. This elicited quite a spirited conversation about skin colour and how the illustrator’s choice of using a dark skin colour for all of the characters pointed to the racism of the illustrator and client. The thing was though, the characters weren’t dark skinned. Not one of them. And yet all of the participants convinced themselves this was the case. We’re certainly not the first to have encountered this phenomenon. There’s quite an active scene looking into issues with eyewitness testimony, and under which conditions our memory maybe unduly swayed or prone to errors. As you can imagine, the consequences of this could be huge. How can we stop getting it wrong? We’re not saying that our memories are always wrong – clearly that’s not the case! But there’s a rhyme and reason behind how our memory operates – both for good and bad. Our brains are BUSY. It’s like a hamster wheel going full on 24/7. Even when sleeping our brain is taking stock of the day, filing away moments into short and long-term memory. In order to look after us, our brains have to prioritise its resources, and it essentially takes shortcuts wherever possible, driving the same way to work each day, ordering the same coffee and so on. Imagine the fatigue we would face if we had to make every decision and action consciously, rather than letting our brains run the show. Which moments matter? So when our brain – a lazy but efficient workaholic – is sorting through events and the happenings of our day, it throws out the mundane, peripheral information it deems unimportant. It instead focuses on creating a highlight reel, and takes the moment of the events and experiences that were the most emotionally intensive, and the final moment. The concept is known as The Peak-End rule, and comes from Daniel Kahneman and his colleague Donald Redelmeier. Their 1996 study, which I am very pleased to not have been a participant in, involved 154 colonoscopy patients rating their level of discomfort at 60-second intervals throughout the procedure, as well as being asked to retrospectively describe how uncomfortable the procedure was. The level of discomfort during the procedure had no correlation to the discomfort they reported retrospectively. As an aside, they followed-up this study with yet more colonoscopy patients, who were split into two groups. One group had the standard procedure and experience of the camera being somewhat painfully removed, and the other had an amended experience that lasted three minutes longer, but which the camera removal was more uncomfortable than painful. The second group – with a longer procedure but less discomfort in the final moments – rated the procedure as less painful than the first group and were more likely to return for subsequent procedures. What was relevant was the peak level of discomfort experienced, as well as the level of discomfort in the final, end moments of the procedure. So what does this tell us? Firstly, that our memory is more fallible than we’d like to realise, more often made up of a series of stitched together moments and thoughts that can be revised and reinterpreted after the fact. Here’s an example - one of the best flights I’ve had was on Air New Zealand to Sydney – the first time we’d flown with my then-infant daughter (you can imagine our nerves!). At the end of the flight we apologised to the man next to us who’d (somehow) been working the whole 3.5 hours. We were suitably self-conscious at the amount of screaming he’d been subjected to but were greatly surprised at how nice he was – telling us that she’d been great, and how his (now teenage) children had subjected him through worse. Then some of the other passengers near us congratulated us on surviving a flight with an infant and how good a flyer she’d been – alongside the cabin staff who were making faces at our daughter to get her to laugh. It's honestly one of the best flights I remember – but clearly it wasn’t that pleasant at the time! The Peak-End rule in action – our actual and remembered experiences diverting wildly. How to apply these learnings to your work Don’t rely on people providing an accurate testimony of their experience. It’s more important to look at what a customer does vs what they say they do. When reviewing a process, journey or customer experience, focus on the moments that matter – the peak emotional moment and the final moment. This provides direction, stopping you from spreading your resources too thin and helping concentrate efforts on the moments most likely to have an impact. Be creative when designing experiences. Because our remembered experience is more important than our actual experience, you have a unique opportunity where you can creatively leave customers with an experience perhaps better than what they had… If you know there’s a frustration or issue during a process, while working on a fix for that, make sure your final moment knocks their socks off.
07 Jul, 2022
In 2014, staff working on London’s underground network went on strike causing massive disruption to millions of commuter trips. For a city so heavily reliant on the tube network this was a disaster that interfered with the habitual travel routines that the city used to get to work and play. While all commuters would’ve been aware of the disruption, and to some degree would have felt it’s effects, some were more affected then others. Strikes resulted in some, but not all, of the networks underground stations to be closed, meaning some commuters were forced to look for new routes while others were able to continue with existing routes. After strikes finished, 5% of disrupted commuters continued with their new routines – suggesting that they’d optimised and improved their travel to work.
Show More
Share by: